Posts Tagged ‘wall street journal’

Klinenberg on H1N1

September 30, 2009

Eric Klinenberg’s Op-Ed in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal about how the Obama family should set a good example for getting the H1N1 flu vaccine reminded me of an entertaining interview he gave about the virus to NPR’s On the Media this spring. In the interview, Klinenberg describes how the media kept contacting him asking him to discuss the panic about H1N1. He kept explaining that there wasn’t a panic. Of course that is part of the problem. According to Klinenberg’s Op-Ed yesterday:

But the case for getting vaccinated is straightforward: Swine Flu may not be more lethal than ordinary seasonal flu, but it is unusually virulent and therefore likely to be more widespread. It is undoubtedly dangerous and it has already killed at least 3,200 people world-wide. It is likely to hit hard starting this fall. In addition to the human toll, a massive outbreak would also affect families, schools, governments and businesses that would find their normal routines disrupted as they deal with containing an outbreak. Hospitals, particularly those in underserved areas, could be overwhelmed by a surge in demand for emergency services. A small number of people may have adverse reactions to vaccinations, but the benefits of not having a mass outbreak outweigh the risks.
Nonetheless, it appears that many people are not planning to get the Swine Flu shot. A recent survey from the University of Pittsburgh shows that about three-quarters of Americans believe that neither they nor their family members or friends will contract H1N1, and a poll from the University of Michigan reveals that only 40% of parents plan to inoculate their children. This summer authorities worried about a vaccine shortage. That’s no longer an issue. The challenge now is making sure enough people get the vaccine to prevent another pandemic.

Swine Flu may not be more lethal than ordinary seasonal flu, but it is unusually virulent and therefore likely to be more widespread. It is undoubtedly dangerous and it has already killed at least 3,200 people world-wide. It is likely to hit hard starting this fall. In addition to the human toll, a massive outbreak would also affect families, schools, governments and businesses that would find their normal routines disrupted as they deal with containing an outbreak. Hospitals, particularly those in underserved areas, could be overwhelmed by a surge in demand for emergency services. A small number of people may have adverse reactions to vaccinations, but the benefits of not having a mass outbreak outweigh the risks.

Nonetheless, it appears that many people are not planning to get the Swine Flu shot. A recent survey from the University of Pittsburgh shows that about three-quarters of Americans believe that neither they nor their family members or friends will contract H1N1, and a poll from the University of Michigan reveals that only 40% of parents plan to inoculate their children.

David Byrne channels his inner-Jane Jacobs

September 15, 2009

David Byrne describes his perfect “livable” city in the Wall Street Journal. In addition to mixed use, public space, and pedestrian-friendly boulevards, he also craves anonymity:

A city can’t be too small. Size guarantees anonymity—if you make an embarrassing mistake in a large city, and it’s not on the cover of the Post, you can probably try again. The generous attitude towards failure that big cities afford is invaluable—it’s how things get created. In a small town everyone knows about your failures, so you are more careful about what you might attempt. Every time I visit San Francisco I ask out loud “Why don’t I live here? Why do I choose to live in a place that is harder, tougher and, well, not as beautiful?” The locals often reply, “You don’t want to live here. It looks like a city, but it’s really a small village. Everyone knows what you’re doing” Oh, OK. If you say so. It’s still beautiful.

(h/t Treehugger)

Shelley Correll in the WSJ

June 18, 2009

In the Wall Street Journal, Rachel Emma Silverman discusses Shelley Correll’s 2007 finding that the pay gap between women without children and women with children is higher than that between men and women.